1969 Ford Capri vs. 2006 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2006 Renault Kangoo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Capri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Capri would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Kangoo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Kangoo (64 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1969 Ford Capri. (63 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Kangoo should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Capri.
Because 1969 Ford Capri is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Capri. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Capri | 2006 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Capri | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1298 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.5:1 |
Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 146 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 50 L |