1969 Ford Corsair vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1969 Ford Corsair is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Triumph 2000 (89 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1969 Ford Corsair. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Corsair. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 285 kg more than 1969 Ford Corsair. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Ford Corsair. (101 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1968 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Ford Corsair.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Corsair | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Corsair | 2000 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 885 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 64 L |