1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 1958 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1969 Ford Fairlane is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Fairlane (81 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1958 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1958 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 100 kg more than 1958 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Fairlane | 1958 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Fairlane | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2781 cc | 1451 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2540 mm |
