1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 1962 Rover P5
To start off, 1969 Ford Fairlane is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Rover P5 (119 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Rover P5 should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Rover P5 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1969 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Fairlane | 1962 Rover P5 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Fairlane | P5 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2781 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 45 L |