1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1969 Ford Fairlane is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 140 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Fairlane | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Fairlane | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2781 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 64 L |
