1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 1974 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1974 Toyota Celica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Toyota Celica (85 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 340 kg more than 1974 Toyota Celica.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Fairlane | 1974 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Fairlane | Celica |
Year Released | 1969 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2781 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 85 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2430 mm |