1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 1996 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1996 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Thunderbird (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 310 kg more than 1969 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Fairlane | 1996 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Fairlane | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1969 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2781 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 60 L |