1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 1996 Mazda Familia
To start off, 1996 Mazda Familia is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 330 kg more than 1996 Mazda Familia.
Because 1969 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Familia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Fairlane | 1996 Mazda Familia | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Fairlane | Familia |
Year Released | 1969 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2781 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 50 L |