1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 1999 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 1999 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lincoln Navigator (296 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Lincoln Navigator weights approximately 1045 kg more than 1969 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Lincoln Navigator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Lincoln Navigator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Fairlane | 1999 Lincoln Navigator | |
| Make | Ford | Lincoln |
| Model | Fairlane | Navigator |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2781 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 2355 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 85 L |
