1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 2000 Fiat Siena
To start off, 2000 Fiat Siena is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 10 kg more than 2000 Fiat Siena.
Because 1969 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Fairlane | 2000 Fiat Siena | |
| Make | Ford | Fiat |
| Model | Fairlane | Siena |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2781 cc | 1910 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1300 kg |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 65 L |
