1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CL
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CL is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CL (315 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CL should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CL weights approximately 736 kg more than 1969 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Fairlane | 2000 Mercedes-Benz CL | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Fairlane | CL |
Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2781 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 315 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 2046 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3090 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 88 L |