1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 2000 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 600 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Fairlane | 2000 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Fairlane | Minica |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2781 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2350 mm |
