1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 2000 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2000 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 110 kg more than 2000 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2000 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Fairlane | 2000 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Fairlane | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2781 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |