1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 2000 Nissan Terrano II
To start off, 2000 Nissan Terrano II is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Nissan Terrano II (116 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Terrano II should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan Terrano II weights approximately 315 kg more than 1969 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Nissan Terrano II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Terrano II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Fairlane | 2000 Nissan Terrano II | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Fairlane | Terrano II |
Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2781 cc | 2388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2660 mm |