1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 2000 Volvo S40
To start off, 2000 Volvo S40 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo S40 (108 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo S40 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1969 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Fairlane | 2000 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Fairlane | S40 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2781 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 108 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 60 L |