1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 2002 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2002 Ford Mustang is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 309 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Mustang weights approximately 172 kg more than 1969 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Fairlane | 2002 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Fairlane | Mustang |
Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2781 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1482 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 68 L |