1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 2003 Toyota Echo
To start off, 2003 Toyota Echo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Echo (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Echo should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 355 kg more than 2003 Toyota Echo.
Because 1969 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Echo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Fairlane | 2003 Toyota Echo | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Fairlane | Echo |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2781 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 955 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 45 L |
