1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,980 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL (604 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 523 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 800 kg more than 1969 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Fairlane | 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Fairlane | SL |
Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2781 cc | 5980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 604 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 2110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 80 L |