1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 2004 Suzuki Samurai
To start off, 2004 Suzuki Samurai is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Fairlane (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2004 Suzuki Samurai. (63 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2004 Suzuki Samurai. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 225 kg more than 2004 Suzuki Samurai. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Suzuki Samurai is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki Samurai will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Fairlane | 2004 Suzuki Samurai | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Fairlane | Samurai |
Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2781 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2490 mm |