1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia K2700 (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia K2700 should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1969 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Fairlane | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
| Make | Ford | Kia |
| Model | Fairlane | K2700 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 2781 cc | 2665 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4150 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1530 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 60 L |
