1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 2005 Mercury Mariner
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mariner is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mariner (153 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mariner should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 169 kg more than 1969 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mariner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Fairlane | 2005 Mercury Mariner | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Fairlane | Mariner |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2781 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 153 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1479 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 62 L |