1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 2005 Proton 300
To start off, 2005 Proton 300 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Fairlane (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2005 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2005 Proton 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 272 kg more than 2005 Proton 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Proton 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Fairlane | 2005 Proton 300 | |
| Make | Ford | Proton |
| Model | Fairlane | 300 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2781 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1038 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2450 mm |
