1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (426 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 345 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 441 kg more than 1969 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Fairlane | 2010 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Fairlane | Camaro |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2781 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 426 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1751 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 72 L |