1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 2010 Nissan Altima
To start off, 2010 Nissan Altima is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Altima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Altima (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Altima should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Altima weights approximately 202 kg more than 1969 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Altima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Fairlane | 2010 Nissan Altima | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Fairlane | Altima |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2781 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1512 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4595 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2675 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 76 L |