1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 2010 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2010 Nissan Navara is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Navara (172 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Navara should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Navara weights approximately 722 kg more than 1969 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Fairlane | 2010 Nissan Navara | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Fairlane | Navara |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2781 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 172 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 2032 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 80 L |
