1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 2010 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2010 Toyota Tundra is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Tundra (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 300 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 374 kg more than 1969 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Fairlane | 2010 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Fairlane | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2781 cc | 5663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 381 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1684 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 100 L |
