1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 2011 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2011 Ford Expedition is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Expedition (310 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford Expedition weights approximately 1365 kg more than 1969 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Fairlane | 2011 Ford Expedition | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Fairlane | Expedition |
Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2781 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 2675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5621 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1974 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3327 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 127 L |