1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 2012 Infiniti FX

To start off, 2012 Infiniti FX is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,696 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Infiniti FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Infiniti FX (316 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Infiniti FX should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane.

Because 2012 Infiniti FX is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Infiniti FX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Ford Fairlane 2012 Infiniti FX
Make Ford Infiniti
Model Fairlane FX
Year Released 1969 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2781 cc 3696 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 81 HP 316 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 7000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear AWD
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 5110 mm 4865 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1680 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2885 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 90 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]