1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 2012 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Fairlane (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2012 Mitsubishi Colt. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2012 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 190 kg more than 1969 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1969 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Fairlane | 2012 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Fairlane | Colt |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2781 cc | 1332 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 47 L |