1969 Ford GT 40 vs. 1992 Mercury Villager
To start off, 1992 Mercury Villager is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1992 Mercury Villager. (149 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1992 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mercury Villager weights approximately 840 kg more than 1969 Ford GT 40.
Because 1969 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford GT 40 | 1992 Mercury Villager | |
| Make | Ford | Mercury |
| Model | GT 40 | Villager |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2860 mm |
