1969 Ford GT 40 vs. 1995 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1995 Mazda Midge is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford GT 40 (350 HP) has 283 more horse power than 1995 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda Midge weights approximately 6 kg more than 1969 Ford GT 40.
Because 1969 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda Midge (101 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1995 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford GT 40 | 1995 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | GT 40 | Midge |
Year Released | 1969 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 101 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1400 mm |