1969 Ford GT 40 vs. 2004 Samsung SM3

To start off, 2004 Samsung SM3 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 256 more horse power than 2004 Samsung SM3. (94 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2004 Samsung SM3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Samsung SM3 weights approximately 200 kg more than 1969 Ford GT 40.

Because 1969 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Samsung SM3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Samsung SM3 (135 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2004 Samsung SM3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Ford GT 40. 2004 Samsung SM3 has automatic transmission and 1969 Ford GT 40 has manual transmission. 1969 Ford GT 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Samsung SM3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: