1969 Ford GT 40 vs. 2005 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2005 Nissan X-Trail. (177 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 490 kg more than 1969 Ford GT 40.
Because 2005 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (245 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford GT 40 | 2005 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | GT 40 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2487 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 245 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1450 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 60 L |