1969 Ford Mustang vs. 1962 Seat 600
To start off, 1969 Ford Mustang is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Seat 600 would be higher. At 4,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1962 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1962 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Mustang weights approximately 590 kg more than 1962 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Mustang | 1962 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Ford | Seat |
| Model | Mustang | 600 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4731 cc | 597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 19 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2010 mm |
