1969 Ford Mustang vs. 1966 Jaguar 420G
To start off, 1969 Ford Mustang is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar 420G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar 420G would be higher. At 4,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jaguar 420G (255 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1969 Ford Mustang. (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jaguar 420G should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Jaguar 420G weights approximately 613 kg more than 1969 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Mustang | 1966 Jaguar 420G | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Mustang | 420G |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4731 cc | 4235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 255 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1778 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 90 L |
