1969 Ford Mustang vs. 1983 Lancia Delta
To start off, 1983 Lancia Delta is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Lancia Delta (250 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1969 Ford Mustang. (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Lancia Delta should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Lancia Delta weights approximately 135 kg more than 1969 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Lancia Delta is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Lancia Delta will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Mustang | 1983 Lancia Delta | |
Make | Ford | Lancia |
Model | Mustang | Delta |
Year Released | 1969 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4731 cc | 1759 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 59 L |