1969 Ford Mustang vs. 1986 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1986 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Mustang (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Mustang weights approximately 241 kg more than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Mustang | 1986 Plymouth Sundance | |
| Make | Ford | Plymouth |
| Model | Mustang | Sundance |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3273 cc | 2211 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2470 mm |
