1969 Ford Mustang vs. 1989 Mazda 323

To start off, 1989 Mazda 323 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Mustang (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1989 Mazda 323. (66 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Mustang weights approximately 546 kg more than 1989 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Ford Mustang (257 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 323. (101 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1969 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 323.

Compare all specifications: