1969 Ford Mustang vs. 1989 Mazda 323
To start off, 1989 Mazda 323 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1989 Mazda 323. (130 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda 323.
Because 1969 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Mustang | 1989 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Mustang | 323 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4731 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2510 mm |