1969 Ford Mustang vs. 1992 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 1992 Suzuki Swift is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Mustang (217 HP) has 158 more horse power than 1992 Suzuki Swift. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1992 Suzuki Swift. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Mustang weights approximately 325 kg more than 1992 Suzuki Swift. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Suzuki Swift, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Mustang | 1992 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Mustang | Swift |
Year Released | 1969 | 1992 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4731 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 59 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 40 L |