1969 Ford Mustang vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1969 Ford Mustang. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Mustang weights approximately 208 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Ford Mustang (257 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 1969 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1969 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1969 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Mustang | 2000 Ford Equator | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Mustang | Equator |
Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3273 cc | 1787 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 160 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3260 mm |