1969 Ford Mustang vs. 2002 Suzuki Covie
To start off, 2002 Suzuki Covie is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki Covie. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Mustang weights approximately 415 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Covie. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki Covie, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Mustang | 2002 Suzuki Covie | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Mustang | Covie |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4731 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 2950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 1530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 35 L |
