1969 Ford Mustang vs. 2003 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2003 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan Pathfinder (238 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1969 Ford Mustang. (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 785 kg more than 1969 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Mustang | 2003 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Mustang | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4731 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 80 L |