1969 Ford Mustang vs. 2004 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2004 Toyota Mark II is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2004 Toyota Mark II. (156 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 455 kg more than 1969 Ford Mustang.
Because 2004 Toyota Mark II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Mark II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Mustang | 2004 Toyota Mark II | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Mustang | Mark II |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4731 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 72 L |
