1969 Ford Mustang vs. 2005 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 270 more horse power than 1969 Ford Mustang. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 319 kg more than 1969 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XJ (525 Nm) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Ford Mustang. (257 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Ford Mustang. 2005 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1969 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1969 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Ford Mustang 2005 Jaguar XJ
Make Ford Jaguar
Model Mustang XJ
Year Released 1969 2005
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3273 cc 4195 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 120 HP 390 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 257 Nm 525 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.7:1 9.1:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1416 kg 1735 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1950 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2920 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]