1969 Ford Mustang vs. 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Mustang (217 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle. (172 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Mustang weights approximately 3 kg more than 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Mustang | 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle | |
| Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
| Model | Mustang | Caravelle |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4731 cc | 2460 cc |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 172 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1162 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 80 L |
