1969 Ford Mustang vs. 2009 Renault Megane
To start off, 2009 Renault Megane is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2009 Renault Megane. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Megane.
Because 1969 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Mustang | 2009 Renault Megane | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | Megane |
Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4731 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 60 L |