1969 Ford Mustang vs. 2012 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2012 Ford Mustang is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Mustang (412 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1969 Ford Mustang. (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Mustang weights approximately 522 kg more than 1969 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Mustang | 2012 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Mustang | Mustang |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4731 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 412 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1417 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 61 L |