1969 Ford Mustang vs. 2012 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2012 Renault Fluence is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Mustang (120 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2012 Renault Fluence. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Fluence. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Mustang weights approximately 191 kg more than 2012 Renault Fluence. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Mustang | 2012 Renault Fluence | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | Fluence |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3273 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 110 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4618 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1809 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2702 mm |