1969 Ford Mustang vs. 2013 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2013 Subaru Forester is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2013 Subaru Forester. (168 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2013 Subaru Forester. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Subaru Forester weights approximately 315 kg more than 1969 Ford Mustang.
Because 2013 Subaru Forester is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Mustang | 2013 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | Mustang | Forester |
Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4731 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2006 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2615 mm |